Safety & risk in practice.
نویسنده
چکیده
IN MEDICINE The Harvard Medical Practice Study in the State of New York (1990) pointed out that 3.7% of a sample of 30195 hospitalized patients suffered an adverse event (AE) resulting in measurable disability. Physician experts reviewed 1133 AEs defined as unintended injuries caused by medical management. The AEs were classified as preventable, unpreventable and potentially preventable (i.e. complications reflecting a low standard of care). Nearly 70% of the AEs were found to be preventable and 6% potentially preventable. Negligence was found in 28% of the AEs. No significant age differences were found in the proportion of preventable AEs. Technical errors were the most common cause of preventable AEs (44%), followed by errors in diagnosis (17%), failures of prevention (12%) and errors in medication (10%). Negligence was more commonly an element in diagnostic failure (71 %) than in technical errors (20%). Preventable AEs showed a higher risk for prolonged disability and death than nonpreventable AEs (60% higher risk of dying). Serious medical injury with long disability or death was more often preventable than slight disability (50% of iatrogenic deaths were preventable). In the USA preventable AEs cost more than 10 billion dollars every year. The authors suggest several areas which should be targeted in hospitals to reduce iatrogenic injury. Identification and reporting methods must be vastly expanded. Hospitals need to rethink the manner in which they deal with human mistakes. Patients' falls in hospital, responsible for a substantial proportion of preventable AEs, demand more attention. The high incidence of technical errors suggests an
منابع مشابه
بررسی عوامل مرتبط با رعایت اصول ایمنی در کار با داروهای شیمیدرمانی در کارکنان پرستاری بیمارستانهای دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اهواز
Background and aims: Many antineoplastic agents are known to be carcinogenic and mutagenic. Nurses are the main groups at risk to these drugs. The purpose of this study was to determine of associated factors with safety principles precaution of working with chemotherapeutic agents among nursing staff. Methods: This is a descriptive-analytical study. Based on the census method, 59 nurses and hea...
متن کاملThe Rise of Patient Safety-II: Should We Give Up Hope on Safety-I and Extracting Value From Patient Safety Incidents?; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
Who could disagree with the seemingly common-sense reasoning that: “We must learn from the things that go wrong.”? Despite major investments to improve patient safety, relatively few evaluations demonstrate convincing reductions in risk, harm, serious error or death. This disappointing trajectory of improvement from learning from errors or Safety-I as it is sometimes known has led some research...
متن کاملA Cross-sectional Study of Road Traffic Safety Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice among Emergency Department Staff
Background and Purpose: Emergency Department (ED) staff are frequently faced with road traffic injury victims and also play role as various road users. This study was conducted to investigate the knowledge, attitude, and practices of ED staff towards road safety at referral trauma hospitals of Tabriz. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2020 in the referral traum...
متن کاملEffectiveness of Safety Training on Knowledge and Practice of Operating Room Personnel Regarding Fire Prevention
Background and Objectives: Fire is an inherent and permanent risk in the operating room and the prevention of it in the operating room require awareness of risks and effective communication between its staffs. Thus the purpose of this study is to determine the awareness and the practice of the operating room staff about fire prevention and to determine the effectiveness of safe...
متن کاملIt Ain’t What You Do (But the Way That You Do It): Will Safety II Transform the Way We Do Patient Safety; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
Mannion and Braithwaite outline a new paradigm for studying and improving patient safety – Safety II. In this response, I argue that Safety I should not be dismissed simply because the safety management strategies that are developed and enacted in the name of Safety I are not always true to the original philosophy of ‘systems thinking.’
متن کاملSafety I to Safety II: A Paradigm Shift or More Work as Imagined?; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
In their editorial, Mannion and Braithwaite contend that the approach to solving the problem of unsafe care, Safety I, is flawed and requires a shift in thinking to what they are calling Safety II. We have reservations as to whether by itself the shift from Safety I to Safety II is sufficient. Perhaps our failure to improve outcomes in the field of patient safety and quality lies less in our ap...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The International journal of risk & safety in medicine
دوره 7 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1995